FREE SPEECH IN PERIL
all over the world, not just in our country, by the
vile deeds of not only the State actors, but also of non-State actors – mostly
religious fundamentalist, chauvinist, extremist groups. Especially the killing
of Chris Stevens, U.S.
ambassador to Libya and a
staunch friend of Arab people, by a well-planned murderous attack, presumably
by al-Qaeda thugs, is quite heartrending and mourned even by several sane
elements in Libya
itself. That a pervert Egyptian Coptic Christian immigrant with a past criminal
record, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula @ Sam Bacile,
aided and funded by an Egyptian-Muslim-convert-to-Christianity, Joseph Nassralla Abdelmasih, founder of the organization Media for Christ, produced and
exhibited a highly critical, caricaturing, slanderous and negative-image-building
film titled ‘Innocence of Muslims’
months ago can never be an excuse for fanatic and chauvinistic Muslim groups
anywhere to go on violent orgies of attacking and killing persons and resorting
to all sorts of vandalism. That the gory slaughter of Chris Stevens and the
attacks on US embassies in Egypt, Libya and protests elsewhere occurred on the
11th anniversary of the 9/11 Massacre is a definite pointer to the
carefully pre-planned nature of such fundamentalist spree. Free speech is too
precious a right, a virtue, to be damned by the dastardly destructive and
murderous attacks of fanatics or the undue advantage taken by deceitful
hate-speakers like Sam Bacile. There is absolutely no reason for Muslims
anywhere to overreact and take to insane orgies of protest; they can well
repulse such attacks on their religious credentials by producing better and
more educative films – counter hate-speech by better propaganda. Likewise the nasty
attempts and actions of the Indian State to implicate and cause punished all
sorts of dissenters under the hated Section 124A of IPC with vague charges of
sedition is another big assault on democracy and free speech in our country.
Today it may be Aseem Trivedi or Seema Azad who face the music but tomorrow any
and every lover of democracy may be in danger due to such arbitrary and
authoritarian actions and statutes. This only reinforces our existing demand
for the immediate repeal of Section 124A, a nasty colonial legacy, from the
statute book. §§§