INSURGENCY AND
‘SURGICAL
STRIKES’
With the understanding of, and to an extent even
an admission of, the saying: “One man’s terrorist is
another man’s freedom fighter,” the situation in Jammu and Kashmir is very peculiar in that only
about 16% of our controlled state area falls in the Kashmir valley, and only
5-6 districts in it are heavily insurgency-infested. Jammu envelops 26% and
Ladakh more than 50%, and are relatively peaceful, shun such militancy and
moreover are eager to fully integrate with India. True, population-wise
Kashmiri Muslims form about 50% of the total – that due to India’s credit which
never disturbed the population proportion in the valley; rather it is the
so-called azadiwallahs who ethnically
cleansed the valley of Kashmiri Pundits in the 1990s itself. Then, as Tarek
Fatah asserts, the people of POK too don’t seem enamored of their Paki
connection and there is an agitation in Gilgit-Baltistan for its ‘azadi’. As
such, Justice Katju’s comparison of the militancy in the valley with the Vietnamese
guerilla war is quite misplaced; the Kashmiri Muslims’ cries for azadi
is just an infatuation with fundamentalist Islam and not the love for any ‘Kashmiriyat’, and a real danger exists
of their being reduced to a slave status in any ‘Mustafa Raj’. However, the Indian Government and Army too have not done
it well by shouting from housetops about the so-called ‘surgical strikes’
carried out in retaliation for the Pakistan inspired, if not directed, attacks;
such audacity can be termed a most stupid measure for any wise statesman or
military strategist. Surprisingly, Pakistan
has also bungled by refusing to admit any such strikes happening, and just tries
to degrade those as repetition of the longstanding LoC violations and blames India for not
letting UN military observers inspect and report on the same. At the same time,
the manner the Pakistani politicians including their prime and defence ministers
as also the fanatic Hafiz Saeed and other leaders of the terrorist outfits
nurtured by them reacted, shows that something very damaging to their plans,
forces and dependant terrorist circles occurred due to these ‘surgical strikes’
and for some reasons, perhaps including avoidance of public disgrace, they
cling on to denials. However, it should also be noted that any armed force or
terrorist group planning well and carrying out surprise attacks always has the
initial advantage but that should not be taken as a decider in any war or longstanding
conflict. As repeatedly asserted in this journal, only a wise and sane course –
building bridges with China to neutralize any danger from it, negotiating with
Pakistan to come to an underhand deal for any rational partition, and, by
conduct of region-wise plebiscite, lending it an official and international
stamp of approval – could be the real solution for this Ravanasura Kaashta-like conflict. §§§